English: This is a demonstration of traditionalist based bias as one may argue that Pythagorean triples should be represented as (a, b, c). In fact c is redundant because it can be calculated as square root of (a2 + b2). On the other hand it is a bias approach to reduce the inherent properties of the nodes to a single key as done in 2011 in file:Pythagorean.tree.svg.
jyehiđ – kopijistiđ, levâttiđ já oovdânpyehtiđ pargo
remiksađ – vaalmâšt muttum pargoid
Čuovvovaš iävtuin:
nommâdem – Tun koolgah adeliđ hiäivulávt nommâalmottâs, liiŋkâ lisensân já almottiđ, láá-uv teekstân tohhum nubástusah. Tun uážuh porgâđ taam puoh tohálâš vuovijgijn, mut ij toin naalijn, et oro et lisensadeleijee lii tuárjumin tuu pargo teikâ suu pargo kevttim.
Lisää yhden rivin pituinen kuvaus tästä tiedostosta
Pythagorean pairs presented as a succession of the generations 1 to generation 4 of the related primitive [[:en:Pythagorean triple|]]s as an alternative codifications of the Berggrens's three